JOURNAL OF CHILEAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY

Vol 62 No 4 (2017): Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society
Original Research Papers

DEGRADATION OF POLY(ETHYLENETEREPHTALATE) WASTE TO OBTAIN OLIGOMERS USING A ZINC COMPLEX AS CATALYST

A. A. Ovalle-Sánchez
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, UANL, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas; Av. Universidad S/N Ciudad Universitaria
P. Elizondo-Martínez
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, UANL, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas; Av. Universidad S/N Ciudad Universitaria
N. A. Pérez-Rodríguez
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, UANL, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas; Av. Universidad S/N Ciudad Universitaria
E. Hernández-Fernández
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, UANL, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas; Av. Universidad S/N Ciudad Universitaria
M. G. Sánchez-Anguiano
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, UANL, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas; Av. Universidad S/N Ciudad Universitaria
Published February 9, 2018
Keywords
  • Poly(ethyleneterephthalate),
  • degradation,
  • catalyst,
  • chemical recycling,
  • glycolysis
How to Cite
Ovalle-Sánchez, A. A., Elizondo-Martínez, P., Pérez-Rodríguez, N. A., Hernández-Fernández, E., & Sánchez-Anguiano, M. G. (2018). DEGRADATION OF POLY(ETHYLENETEREPHTALATE) WASTE TO OBTAIN OLIGOMERS USING A ZINC COMPLEX AS CATALYST. Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society, 62(4). Retrieved from https://jcchems.com/index.php/JCCHEMS/article/view/468

Abstract

Thermal degradation of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) bottles waste was carried out by glycolysis using triethyleneglycol (TEG) as nucleophilic agent and N1,N2-bis(2-aminobenzyl)-1,2-diaminoethane zinc(II) (ABEN), in order to test this compound as catalyst in the degradation of PET until to obtain short chains of polyester (oligomers). The depolymerization processes was tested at 180, 190 and 210 °C, and two molar ratios of PET:TEG (1:1.3 and 1:2.6), the amount of catalyst used was fixed at 1% in relation to PET, the best experiment of PET glycolysis was found at 190 °C during two hours in a mass relation PET:TEG 1:1.3. All products were analyzed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (IR), gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), the behavior of the reaction rate was studied for the best experiment by measuring the amount of degraded PET at different glycolysis time. The degradation of PET was favored with the use of ABEN, which accelerates the reaction, obtaining oligomers in the absence of an organic solvent or reaction medium, this is the most efficient catalyst found so far. The oligomers were obtained with molecular weight between 900 and 1500 g mol-1 depending on the reaction time, 60 min was the less time of the total glycolysis of PET. Also was found that the molecular weight of the oligomers increased along the glycolysis, due to the recombination with TEG and ethylene glycol produced in degradation.

References

  1. S.M. Cakić, I.S. Ristić, M. M-Cincovik, N.C. Nikolić, O.Z. Ilić, D.T. Stojiljković, J.K. B-Simendić, Prog. Org. Coat. 74, 124, (2012).
  2. C. Gioia, M. Vannini, P. Marchese, A. Minesso, R. Cavalieri, M. Colonna, A. Celli, Green Chem. 16, 1808, (2014).
  3. A. El-Mejjatti, T. Harit, A. Riahi, R. Khiari, I. Bouabdallah, F. Malek, Polymer Letters 8, 544, (2014).
  4. A.P. More, R.A. Kute, Iran. Polym. J. 23, 59, (2014).
  5. M.E. Tawfik, S.B. Eskander, Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 95, 187, (2010).
  6. R.M. Musale, S.R. Shukla, Int. J. Plast. Technol. 20, 106, (2016).
  7. A. Aguado, L. Martínez, L. Becerra, M. Arieta-Araunabeña, S. Arnaiz, A. Asueta, I. Robertson, J. Mater. Cycles Waste 16, 201, (2014).
  8. M.F.A. Viante, C.S. Nunes, E.C. Muniz, M.L. Felsner, C.A.P. Almeida, Polym. Int. 65, 1024, (2016).
  9. A.M. Al-Sabagh, F.Z. Yehia, Gh. Eshaq, A.M. Rabie, A.E. ElMetwally, Egyptian J. Of Petroleum. 25, 53, (2016).
  10. A. Ptičck, A. Fijačko, Z. Hrnjak-Murgič, Chem. Biochem. Eng. 27, 65, (2013).
  11. D. Carta, G. Cao, C. D`Angeli, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 10, 390, (2003).
  12. Ch. H. Chen, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 87, 2004, (2003).
  13. B. Geyer, G. Lorenz, A. Kandelbauer, Express Polym. Lett. 10, 559, (2016).
  14. M.E. Viana, A. Riul, G.M. Carvalho, A.F. Rubira, E.C. Muniz, Chem. Eng. J. 173, 210, (2011).
  15. N. George, T. Kurian, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53, 14185, (2014).
  16. N.D. Pingale, V.. Palekar, S.R. Shukla, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 115, 249, (2010).
  17. M. Ghaemy, F. Behzadi, Iran. Polym. J. 11, 77, (2002).
  18. R. López-Fonseca, I. Duque-Ingunza, B. Rivas, S. Arnaiz, J. Gutierrez- Ortiz, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 95, 1022, (2010).
  19. M.E. Viana, A. Riul, G.M. Carvalho, A.F. Rubira, E.C. Muñiz, Chem. Eng. J. 173, 210, (2011).
  20. M.Y. Abdelaal, T.R. Sobahi, M.S. Makki, Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 3267, (2011).
  21. S.R. Shukla, A.M. Harad, J. Appl. Polym, Sci. 97, 513, (2005).
  22. H. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Li, X. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Eur. Polym. J. 45, 1535, (2009).
  23. M. Zhu, S. Li, Z. Li, X. Lu, S. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J. 185, 168, (2012).
  24. K. Fukushima, O. Coulembier, J.M. Lecuyer, H.A. Almegren, A.M. Alabdulrahman, F.D. Alsewailem, M.A. Mcneil, P. Dubois, R.M. Waymouth, H.W. Horn, J.E. Rice, J.L. Hedrick, J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 49, 1273, (2011).
  25. V. Sharma, P. Shrivastava, D.D. Agarwal, J. Polym. Res. 22, 241, (2015).
  26. M.A. Alnaqbi, M.A. Mohsin, R.M. Busheer, Y. Haik, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Doi: 10.1002/APP.41666, (2015).
  27. M.Y. Abdelaal, T.R. Sobahi, M.S.I. Makki, Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 3267, (2011).
  28. A.R. Zahedi, M. Rafizadeh, F.A. Taromi, J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mat. 27,1256, (2014).
  29. P. Elizondo, B. Nájera, N.A. Pérez, L. Hinojosa, M.I. Gómez J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 78, 591, (2013).
  30. V. Pimpa, R. Sirisook, S. Chuayjuljit, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 88, 788, (2003).
  31. R.M.K. Prado, Ch.R. Nascimento, Ch. Azuma, M.L. Dias, Prog. Rubber. Plast. Re. 24, 183, (2008).

Copyright @2019 | Designed by: Open Journal Systems Chile Logo Open Journal Systems Chile Support OJS, training, DOI, Indexing, Hosting OJS

Code under GNU license: OJS PKP